Tuesday, November 05, 2002
I sent this description of what's on the site to Arthur Silber, and he thought it might be useful to Qs for Os reader more generally: I hope this is clear on the site, but I intend Qs for Os to be a VERY wide-ranging resource. So some of the questions are things that I straight-up think Objectivism cannot answer (for some of those I also give my own arguments; for others I just throw out the question as food for thought), some are things that "orthodox" or party-line Objectivists can't answer but more flexible people heavily influenced by Rand can answer, and some are things that even party-line Objectivists can answer, which I include because the process of answering the question can lead to some fruitful introspection or debate.